| |

Development of Panchayati Raj  in India

Panchayati Raj is an insignificant provision of the Gandhian principle. However, the constitution did not obligate governments to constitute panchayats. Article 40 of the Indian Constitution only provided a Directive Principle of State Policy that said the state should organise village panchayats and give them the necessary powers and authority to function. However, this was not mandatory then.

With the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992, the modern Panchayati Raj was introduced in Indiato illuminate democracy at the grassroots level and was entrusted with rural development in the country.

It is enlisted in Part 9 of the Indian constitution. Articles 243 and 243A- 243O under this Part discuss rural local self-government.

The History of Panchayat Raj in India:

The Panchayati Raj system has an ancient origin in India.

  • In the vedic era, the word ‘Panchayatan’ has been mentioned in many Sanskrit texts, which means a group of 5 persons who used to decide various affairs. In the Rigveda, we found evidence of Sabha, Samiti and Vidatha as local self-units.
  • In epic era, the ‘Ramayana’ indicates that the administration was divided into 2 parts, viz. Pur (city) and Janpad (village). We also found the example of self-government of a village in the ‘Shanti Parva’ of the Mahabharata and in the Manu Smriti.
Chief Official Number of Villages
Dashap Chief of 10 villages
Vinshya Adhipati Chief of 20 villages
Shat Gram Adhyaksha Chief of 100 villages
Shat Gram Pati Chief of 1000 villages
  • In ancient times, village panchayats were mentioned in Kautilya’s Arthashastra.
  • In the Medieval Period (Delhi sultanate), for the village administration, Mukkaddam (administrator), Choudhrie (disputes settler) and Patwaris (revenue collector) were appointed.
  • Under British rule, village panchayats lost their autonomy and became weak. It was only in the year 1870 that India saw the dawn of representative local institutions.
Everything You Need To Know About

Evolution of Panchayati Raj after Independence

The first Panchayati Panchayati Raj came up at Nagaur (Rajasthan) in 1959 as per the recommendations of the Balwant Rai Committee. This committee did far-reaching work in rural democracy, which brought Balwant Rai the title of “Father of Panchayati Raj.” Gradually, this system was adopted by other states like Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra.

1. Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957)

  1. In January 1957, the central government appointed a committee to inquire into the working of the National Extension Service and Community Development Programme and also asked for suggestions for their better working.
  2. Balwant Rai G Mehta was the chairman of this committee. Under his chairmanship, the committee submitted its report in November 1957.
  3. The committee recommended the establishment of ‘democratic decentralisation’.
Recommendations of Balwant Rai Mehta Committee
  • Establishment of a 3-tier panchayati raj system. Viz: Gram panchayat (village level), Panchayat Samiti(block level) and Zila Parishad(district level).
  • All these tiers should be connected through a method of indirect election.
  • The village panchayat should be directly elected representatives, whereas the panchayat samiti and zila parishad members should be indirectly elected.
  • The panchayat samiti should be the executive body, while the zila parishad should be the advisory, coordinating and supervisory body.
  • The chairperson of the Zila Parishad should be the district collector.
  • Adequate resources should be transferred to these institutions to enable them to discharge their duties.

Most of the recommendations of this committee were accepted by the National Development Council in January 1958. However, the council did not insist on a single rigid pattern for all the states. It left the decisions to the states to evolve their patterns suitable to respective local conditions without disrupting the basic principles and broad fundamentals of Panchayati Raj.

  • For example, even today, West Bengal has adopted the 4-tier system, Rajasthan has adopted the 3-tier system, and Tamil Nadu has adopted the 2-tier system.

2. Ashok Mehta Committee (1977)

  1. The Janata Government (December 1977) appointed a committee on panchayati raj under the chairmanship of Ashok Mehta, which submitted its report in August 1978.
    1. No action could be taken on the recommendations of the Ashok Mehta Committee as the Janata Government collapsed before the completion of its term.
Recommendations of Balwant Rai Mehta Committee
  • The 3-tier panchayat system should be replaced by the 2-tier system,i.e., Zila Parishad (district level)and, below it, the Mandal Panchayat.
  • A district should be the first point for decentralisation.
  • Zila Parishad should be the executive body and accountable for the district-level planning.
  • An official participation of the political parties in all 3 levels of panchayat elections should be there.
  • Compulsory taxation powers should be given to the panchayati rajinstitutions to mobilise their financial resources.
  • A district-level agency should be appointed for a  regular social audit.
  • The state government should not eradicate the panchayat.
  • In case of an imperative supersession, elections should be held within 6 months from the date of supersession.
  • Nyaya panchayat should work as a separate body.
  • Seats for S.C.s and S.T.s should be reserved based on their population.
  • Development functions should be given to the Zila parishad.
  • A minister for panchayati raj institution should be appointed to the state council of ministers.
  • Constitutional recognition should be given to the Panchayati Raj institutions.

3.G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985)

  1. Under the chairmanship of G.V.K. Rao (appointed by the Planning Commission), a committee was appointed to look into existing administrative provisions for rural development and poverty alleviation programmes.
  2. The committee came to the epilogue that the developmental process was gradually bureaucratised, which weakened the Panchayati Raj institutions, resulting in ‘grass without roots’.
Recommendations of G.V.K. Rao Committee
  • The district-level body, Zila Parishad, should be of pivotal importance in the process of democratic decentralisation.
  • The institutions at the district and lower levels should be given a significant role in the monitoring, planning, and implementation of rural development programmes.
  • An office of the District Development Commissioner should be created, who will act as the chief executive officer of the Zila Parishad.Elections of Panchayati Raj institutions should be held regularly.

4. L. M. Singhvi Committee (1986)

Under the chairmanship of L.M. Singhvi, former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi appointed a committee to equip a concept paper on ‘Revitalisation of Panchayati Raj Institutions for Democracy and Development’.

Recommendations of L M Singhvi Committee
  • A new chapter should be added to the Constitution of India so that the panchayat should be constitutionally recognised, protected and preserved.
  • For a cluster of villages, Nyaya Panchayats should be established.
  • It highlighted the importance of the Gram Sabha in direct democracy.
  • The Village Panchayats should be given more financial resources.
  • The judicial tribunals should be commenced in each state to adjudicate controversies about the election to the Panchayats, their dissolution and other matters related to their functioning.

5.Thungon Committee (1988)

A sub-committee under the Consultative Committee of Parliament was constituted under P.K. Thungon’s chairmanship to examine the district’s political and administrative structure for district planning.

Recommendations of the Thungon Committee
  • The institution of Panchayati Raj should be constitutionally recognised.
  • A 3-tier system of Panchayati Raj with panchayats at the village, block and district levels should be established.
  • Zilla Parishad should be the pivot of the Panchayati Raj system.
  • The institution should have a fixed tenure of five years.
  • The maximum period of supersession of a body should be six months.
  • An elaborated list of subjects for Panchayati Raj institutions should be prepared and incorporated in the constitution.
  • Reserving seats in all the 3 tiers should be based on population for Scs, STs and women.
  • A state finance commission should be set up in each state.
  • The district collector should be appointed as the chief executive officer of the Zilla Parishad.

6. Gadgil Committee (1988)

The Committee on Policy and Programmes was constituted under the chairmanship of V.N. Gadgil on how Panchayati Raj institutions could be effective. Its recommendations became the basis for drafting an amendment bill to confer constitutional status and protection to the Panchayati Raj institutions.

Recommendations of Gadgil Committee
  • A constitutional status for thePanchayati Raj institutions is the prime need.
  • A 3-tier system of Panchayati Raj with panchayats at the village, block and district levels.
  • The term of Panchayati Raj institutions should be fixed at five years.
  • The members of the Panchayats at all three levels should be directly elected.
  • Reservation for S.C.s, STs and women according to their population.
  • The Panchayati Raj bodies should be responsible for preparing and implementing plans for socioeconomic development.
  • For this purpose, a list of subjects should be secluded in the constitution of India. 
  • The Panchayat Raj institutions should be empowered to levy, collect and appropriate taxes and duties.
  • Establishment of a State Finance Commission to allocate finances to the Panchayats.
  • Establishment of a State Election Commission to conduct elections to the panchayats.
Important committees on Panchayati Raj
  1. Dantwala Committee Report on Block-Level Planning (1978)
  2. Hanumantha Rao Committee Report on District Planning (1984)
Recommendations:
  • Both committees have suggested that the basic decentralised planning function should be done at the district level.
  • The Hanumantha Rao Committee advocated separate district planning bodies under either the District Collector or a minister.
  • The committees also recommended that the Collector should be the coordinator, at the district level, of all developmental and planning activities.

Constitutionalisation of Panchayati Raj

1.Rajiv Gandhi Government

  • The 64th Constitutional Amendment Bill was presented in the Lok Sabha in July 1989 to constitutionalise panchayati raj institutions and make them more powerful and broad-based during Rajiv Gandhi’s government. As the Rajya Sabha did not approve it, the bill lapsed.

2. V.P. Singh Government

  • After assuming office in 1989, under the Prime Ministership of V.P. Singh, the National Front Government announced that it would take steps to strengthen the Panchayati Raj institutions.
  • In June 1990, a  conference of the all-state chief ministers was held under the chairmanship of V.P. Singh to discuss the issues relating to strengthening the Panchayati Raj institutions.
  • The conference approved the proposals for introducing a fresh constitutional amendment bill.
  • Further, a constitutional amendment bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in September 1990. However, the government’s fall resulted in the bill’s lapse.

3. Narasimha Rao Government

  1. The Congress Government, under the prime ministership of P.V. Narasimha Rao, once again considered the matter of the constitutionalisation of panchayati raj bodies.
    • In September 1991, it drastically modified the proposals to obliterate the controversial aspects and introduced a fresh constitutional amendment bill in the Lok Sabha.
    • Finally, this bill arose as the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992 and came into force on 24 April 1993.

This is how the Panchayati Raj and the urban local governance system developed in India as we know it today. In the next series of chapters we shall study how these systems practically function.

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments