Do not publish NIRF ranking for 2025: HC to Education Ministry
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 5)
Context |
|
Petitioner’s Claims
-
The petitioner argued that NIRF rankings lack transparency and are misleading students.
-
Institutions self-upload data on parameters like faculty strength, salaries, placements, and research funds without independent verification.
-
In contrast, NAAC accreditation follows a rigorous audit process by expert committees.
Key Concerns Raised
-
The petitioner requested that NIRF rankings be based on verified government records and that the calculation method be disclosed.
-
The court has restrained publication of NIRF 2025 rankings until further review.
NIRF Rankings: Importance, Challenges, and Way Forward |
Importance of NIRF Rankings
Challenges Associated
Ways to Improve NIRF Rankings
|
Practice Question: Discuss the significance of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) in higher education. What challenges does it face, and how can its ranking methodology be improved? (150 Words /10 marks) |