|

Reducing Fertiliser Dependence: India’s Shift Towards Balanced and Efficient Alternatives

Get Your PDF

(Source – Indian Express, Section – Explained- Page No. – 12)

Topic: GS3 – Agriculture

Context

  • India is strategically shifting towards reducing the consumption of high-analysis imported fertilisers like urea, DAP, and MOP by promoting balanced alternatives such as ammonium phosphate sulphate (APS) to ensure nutrient efficiency and reduce import dependence.

Analysis of the news:

Strategic Need for Reducing Fertiliser Consumption

  • India’s reliance on imported fertilisers like urea, di-ammonium phosphate (DAP), and muriate of potash (MOP) has made capping their usage a strategic priority.

  • MOP is entirely imported due to the absence of domestic potash reserves.

  • Although 85% of urea demand is met domestically, it depends heavily on imported liquefied natural gas.

  • DAP’s complex import requirements further increase India’s vulnerability to global market fluctuations and foreign exchange pressures.

Challenges of High-Analysis Fertilisers

  • Urea, DAP, and MOP are high-analysis fertilisers with concentrated nutrient content.

  • However, most crops do not require such high levels of individual nutrients.

  • Excessive use leads to nutrient imbalance in soils, affecting crop yields. Additionally, overdependence on imported fertilisers escalates costs, especially with rupee depreciation.

  • Balanced fertilisation, involving secondary and micronutrients, is essential for sustainable agriculture and efficient use of foreign exchange.

Ammonium Phosphate Sulphate (APS): An Effective DAP Alternative

  • APS has emerged as a viable substitute for DAP.

  • It offers balanced nutrients, including sulphur, crucial for crops like oilseeds, pulses, and maize.

  • Unlike DAP, APS requires significantly less expensive phosphoric acid, making it a cost-effective solution.

  • Its rising consumption, surpassing single super phosphate (SSP), highlights its growing acceptance across India due to its water-soluble phosphorus and balanced nutrient composition.

Economic and Market Dynamics Driving APS Adoption

  • Government policies and market economics are pivotal in promoting APS.

  • The rising cost of DAP imports, coupled with limited subsidies, has made DAP less viable. In contrast, APS offers profitability to manufacturers while being marginally cheaper for farmers.

  • The increasing adoption of APS is reflected in its sales surge, positioning it as India’s third-largest consumed fertiliser after urea and DAP.

Way Forward: Diversification and Efficiency in Fertiliser Use

  • India must further diversify fertiliser use by promoting other balanced complexes .

  • The goal should be reducing high-analysis fertiliser consumption, encouraging nutrient-efficient practices, and optimising foreign exchange use.

  • A robust marketing push, supported by government incentives, can facilitate this transition, ensuring sustainable agricultural growth and reduced import dependency.

PYQ: With reference to chemical fertilizers in India, consider the following statements: (2020)

  1. At present, the retail price of chemical fertilizers is market-driven and not administered by the Government.

  2. Ammonia, which is an input of urea, is produced from natural gas.

  3. Sulphur, which is a raw material for phosphoric acid fertilizer, is a by-product of oil refineries.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 2 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Ans: (b)

Practice Question: Discuss the challenges associated with India’s dependence on imported fertilisers like urea, DAP, and MOP. How can alternatives such as ammonium phosphate sulphate (APS) contribute to sustainable agriculture and reduce import reliance? (150 Words /10 marks)

Similar Posts