• Correct Answer: (d) Notify rules under relevant environmental laws
  Explanation:
  The Supreme Court ruled that statutory rules must be in place before boards can impose restitutionary fines.
  Other options are not legal requirements under Indian environmental law.

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

• (c) Correct: The court noted the policy lacked Social Impact Assessment and environmental studies before notification.

• (a) Incorrect: No clash with central schemes was cited.

• (b) Incorrect: Though issues for landless labourers were raised, traders were not the main legal focus.

• (d) Incorrect: WTO rules were irrelevant here.
  

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

• (c) Correct: SC held Parliament can choose to act or not act, regardless of in-house inquiry recommendations.

• (a) Incorrect: There is no compulsion to remove.

• (b) Incorrect: Parliament does not need prior Presidential approval to decide.

(d) Incorrect: Parliament is the deciding authority in removal.

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

• (c) Correct: PM Modi pledged to safeguard farmers, dairy farmers, and fishermen’s interests.

• (a) Incorrect: Steel was not mentioned in his statement.

• (b) Incorrect: Pharma was not the focus here.

(d) Incorrect: Renewable energy was not highlighted in the speech.

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

• (c) Correct: The FIR accused the actor of acting in obscene content; the HC granted interim stay pending review.

• (a) Incorrect: Jurisdiction was not the basis for the stay.

• (b) Incorrect: The issue was not financial fraud.

• (d) Incorrect: The FIR was criminal in nature, not purely civil.