| |

11 April 2025 : The Hindu Editorial Analysis

Get Your PDF

1. Drop the piecemeal ways to social security for workers

(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 8)

Topic: GS2 – Social Security
Context
  • India is working to extend social security benefits to gig workers through a central scheme.
  • This effort highlights the need for a universal, inclusive social protection framework for all informal workers.

New Steps Towards Social Security for Gig Workers

  • India is moving forward with a central scheme for online (app-based) gig workers, which is awaiting Cabinet approval.
  • The scheme offers health coverage under Ayushman Bharat, and registration on the eShram portal to help workers access different social security benefits.
  • A transaction-based pension system is planned, using a universal account number to track earnings across platforms and ensure companies contribute to pensions.
  • This pension plan recognizes that gig workers may have multiple employers and ensures shared responsibility for worker welfare.
  • Since social security in India is usually linked to formal employment, this step is significant in bringing informal gig workers into the fold.

Limitations in the Existing Social Protection System

  • Although India helped form the International Labour Organisation, it has not ratified the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102).
  • India passed the Code on Social Security nearly 70 years later, aiming to create a broader protection framework.
  • However, this Code has been criticized for vague definitions, weaker protections, and challenges in implementation.
  • The Code relies on welfare boards to provide benefits, but these boards often fail to meet goals.
  • A Right To Information finding revealed that states had not used ₹70,744.16 crore collected as welfare cess from employers.
  • A 2024 audit report showed delays in remittance of ₹221.8 crore by 99 local bodies in Tamil Nadu to the Construction Workers Welfare Board.
  • Even in states with strong welfare records, like Kerala, only 5 out of 16 boards functioned effectively, and some reported no beneficiaries.

Problems With a Fragmented Approach

  • Some argue that welfare boards offer targeted relief, like Karnataka’s beedi and cigarette workers requesting revival of a defunct fund.
  • However, focusing on one group at a time ignores the uncertain nature of informal work in general.
  • It can also create unfair divisions between types of informal work, such as between gig workers and domestic workers.
  • Relying on gig work alone to formalize informal labour is overly optimistic, as new job types will continue to emerge.

Building a Universal Social Protection Framework

  • India needs a future-ready social protection system that adjusts with changes in work types and sectors.
  • The Code is likely to stay, even with its issues. States can still develop their own measures within its structure.
  • A good starting point would be to treat the Code as a minimum standard and build upon it to create a stronger, more inclusive, and universal system.
  • The ultimate goal should be a framework that includes every worker, without exception, and can adapt over time. 
Practice Question:  Discuss the challenges of providing social security to gig and informal workers in India. How can a universal social protection system address these issues? (250 Words /15 marks)

2. Are existing mechanisms effective in combating judicial corruption?

(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 9)

Topic: GS2 – Indian Polity – Judiciary
Context
  • Recently, a large amount of unaccounted cash was reportedly found at the residence of a former High Court judge.
  • This has sparked a broader debate on the effectiveness of existing mechanisms to combat corruption in the judiciary.

Effectiveness of Impeachment

  • The process of impeachment is extremely difficult and rarely successful, requiring a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament.
  • While it protects judicial independence by preventing misuse for political gains, it is not effective as a deterrent against corruption.
  • A transparent internal system within the judiciary is needed to handle cases of serious misconduct and maintain public trust.

Need for Reforms in In-House Procedures

    • The current internal mechanism was created to prevent misuse of legal action by the executive against judges.
    • It gained recognition after a major court ruling in 1991, which issued safeguards for judicial officers.
    • However, the mechanism may benefit from legal reforms to ensure greater accountability and efficiency.
  • Past cases show that judicial corruption is difficult to prosecute due to weak enforcement and protection offered to judges.

Importance of Making Inquiry Reports Public

  • Greater transparency in inquiry procedures is essential in today’s environment of constant public scrutiny.
  • Making reports public can help reinforce trust in the judiciary and avoid speculation.
  • However, transparency should be balanced with protecting the rights of the accused and maintaining the fairness of the inquiry.
  • Communication must be clear to prevent misinformation and protect the reputation of the institution.

Revisiting the Role of the Executive in Appointments

  • The executive already plays an informal yet significant role in judicial appointments through background checks and delayed approvals.
  • The current system allows the executive to block appointments without formal rejection.
  • Transparency and clarity in the selection process are more important than which body—government or judiciary—makes the appointments.

Why Past Bills May Not Help

  • A previous bill aimed at judicial accountability failed to address important gaps.
  • Instead of more oversight bodies, clear standards of conduct and internal mechanisms like peer reviews should be developed.
  • Disclosure of family members in the legal profession and structural changes are necessary to avoid conflicts of interest.

Need to Liberalise Contempt Laws

  • The fear of contempt should not stop people from discussing judicial corruption in good faith.
  • There should be space for constructive criticism without the threat of criminal penalties.
  • Reforms must ensure judges do not misuse contempt laws to avoid scrutiny.
  • Institutional changes are necessary to allow for open and fair public discussion about judicial integrity. 
Practice Question:  In light of recent controversies involving judicial misconduct, critically examine the effectiveness of existing mechanisms for judicial accountability in India. (250 Words /15 marks)

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *