22 November 2024 : The Hindu Editorial Analysis
1. India needs an environmental health regulatory agency
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 8)
| Topic: GS2 – Governance, GS3 – Environment |
| Context |
|
COP 29 and India’s Environmental Health Challenges
- The 2024 Conference of Parties (COP 29) concludes in Baku, Azerbaijan, emphasising climate mitigation financing.
- India is at a critical juncture, grappling with rising greenhouse gas emissions (6% increase in 2024) and severe environmental health risks.
- Rapid economic growth highlights the need to address the interconnected challenges of climate, environment, health, and the economy.
The Case for an Environmental Health Regulatory Agency (EHRA)
- India requires a centralised Environmental Health Regulatory Agency (EHRA) to integrate pollution control and health risk mitigation.
- Existing agencies like the CPCB and MoEFCC lack coordination with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, limiting effective governance.
- An EHRA could provide inter-disciplinary governance, bridging the gap between environmental monitoring and public health protection.
Global Models of Integration
- International agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Germany’s Federal Environment Agency, and Japan’s Ministry of Environment offer inspiration.
- These agencies combine environmental regulation with health monitoring and sustainable practices.
- Their frameworks demonstrate how integrated efforts can enforce pollution controls while promoting public health.
Data-Driven and Evidence-Based Framework
- Reliable data is essential for effective regulation. India lacks a central body to translate environmental health research into actionable policies.
- An EHRA could commission context-specific studies, integrate health impact assessments, and address unique challenges like air pollution, chemical exposures, and vector-borne diseases.
- Health impact assessments (HIAs) for major projects would allow proactive mitigation of risks.
Economic Growth and Sustainability
- Contrary to fears of regulation hindering growth, an EHRA could promote sustainable practices that foster innovation, green jobs, and economic resilience.
- Examples from the U.S. EPA show that environmental regulations can spur investments in renewable energy and pollution prevention.
- An incentivised energy transition could align economic policies with environmental health objectives.
Community Engagement and Accountability
- An EHRA could educate citizens on environmental health risks and empower communities to advocate for cleaner living conditions.
- Collaboration with NGOs, local bodies, and journalists is critical for accountability.
- Public participation could ensure bottom-up implementation of policies tailored to local needs.
Aligning with Global Commitments
- India’s commitments under the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require cohesive national policies.
- An EHRA could help align India’s domestic policies with global standards and tackle transboundary climate and health challenges.
Regional Variations and Local Solutions
- Environmental health issues vary across regions, requiring localised interventions.
- An EHRA could work with state and municipal governments to develop region-specific policies and monitor health outcomes.
Building Accountability and Overcoming Challenges
- Challenges include bureaucratic inertia and industry resistance.
- Clear frameworks for inter-ministerial coordination and operational independence of the EHRA are essential.
- India’s success in renewable energy targets demonstrates its capacity for systemic change.
Conclusion
- An EHRA could frame pollution control as both a public health priority and an economic opportunity.
- By integrating environmental and health governance, India could achieve long-term sustainability, fulfilling its global commitments while protecting its citizens’ health.
| Practice Question: Discuss the importance of establishing a centralised Environmental Health Regulatory Agency (EHRA) in India. How can it address the challenges of environmental pollution and public health while fostering sustainable economic growth? (250 Words /15 marks) |
2. A bilateral investment treaty with a ‘bit’ of change
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 8)
| Context |
|
Introduction to the BIT
- The India-UAE Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), signed earlier in 2024, replaces the 2014 treaty and showcases India’s evolving investment treaty practice.
- It is critical for understanding India’s ongoing negotiations with countries like the United Kingdom and the European Union.
- A standard BIT aims to balance investment protection and the state’s sovereign right to regulate, while reducing the discretion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals.
Departures from India’s Model BIT
1. Reduced Local Remedies Waiting Period:
- The India-UAE BIT shortens the mandatory waiting period for exhausting local remedies before filing an ISDS claim to three years, compared to five years in India’s 2015 Model BIT.
- This adjustment responds to concerns from foreign investors about delays in the Indian judicial system, enhancing access to ISDS.
- India need not worry about increased treaty claims as long as regulatory abuse is avoided.
2. Broader Definition of Investment:
- The requirement for investments to be significant for the host state’s development, present in the Model BIT, is absent in the India-UAE BIT.
- By eliminating this subjective criterion, the treaty reduces arbitral discretion and clarifies jurisdictional issues.
- Investments must meet key economic characteristics, such as capital commitment, profit expectation, and risk assumption.
3. Clarified Grounds for Treaty Violations:
- Article 4 of the India-UAE BIT explicitly lists violations, including denial of justice and fundamental breaches of due process.
- Unlike the Model BIT, it excludes references to customary international law (CIL), reducing the scope for arbitral discretion given the unsettled nature of CIL.
Continuities with the Model BIT
1. Exclusion of Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Provision:
- Similar to the Model BIT, the India-UAE BIT excludes the MFN clause, maintaining the state’s regulatory autonomy.
2. Taxation Exemption:
- The treaty excludes taxation measures from its scope, even if they are potentially abusive, maximising state control over tax-related issues.
3. Limitations on ISDS Tribunal Jurisdiction:
- Article 14.6(i) prevents ISDS tribunals from reviewing the “merits” of domestic court decisions, though this term’s ambiguity may restrict tribunal powers.
Notable Additions in the India-UAE BIT
1. Prohibition on Third-Party Funding:
- The treaty explicitly disallows third-party funding, a step beyond the Model BIT.
2. Fraud and Corruption Clause:
- ISDS is unavailable if allegations of fraud or corruption are made against the investor.
| India’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) |
|
Objective Balances investor protection with the sovereign right of the host state to regulate in the public interest.Revised in 2016 to address disputes under earlier BITs and safeguard regulatory autonomy. Key Features Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Narrowly defined to prevent arbitrary claims by investors. Exclusion of Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Clause: Prevents treaty shopping by foreign investors. Non-Expropriation: Allows expropriation only for public purposes with fair compensation.Protects the state’s right to regulate for health, environment, and welfare. Right to Regulate:Explicit protection of public interest policies in areas like health and environment. Investor Obligations: Mandates compliance with host country laws, including environmental and social standards. Exclusions Taxation Matters: No Investor-State Dispute Settlement protection (ISDS) for tax-related disputes. MFN Clause: Absent to prevent misuse of provisions from other treaties. Benefits Balances investment protection and sovereign regulation.Encourages responsible investment through investor obligations.Limits treaty exploitation by narrowing FET and excluding MFN.Promotes domestic legal systems via local remedies requirements. Challenges May deter investors due to stricter conditions and limited ISDS.Exclusion of MFN and taxation issues could reduce India’s appeal.Local remedies requirement may cause delays in dispute resolution. |
Conclusion
- The India-UAE BIT balances investment protection and regulatory sovereignty while addressing specific concerns about India’s judicial system and arbitration ambiguities.
- Developed countries may appreciate the softened waiting period but remain cautious about the exclusion of MFN and taxation issues.
| PYQ: Justify the need for FDI for the development of the Indian economy. Why there is gap between MOUs signed and actual FDIs? Suggest remedial steps to be taken for increasing actual FDIs in India. (200 words/12.5m) (UPSC CSE (M) GS-3 2016) |
| Practice Question: Examine the significance of the India-UAE Bilateral Investment Treaty in shaping India’s investment treaty practices. Discuss how its provisions balance foreign investment protection and the state’s regulatory autonomy. (250 Words /15 marks) |
3. Is social media doing more harm than good to democracy?
(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 9)
| Topic: GS2 – Governance |
| Context |
|
Ownership and its Impact on Social Media Usage
- Ownership of a platform can significantly influence its function as a news dissemination tool.
- While social media has historically been a vital space for sharing and accessing news, ownership with personal or political motives can undermine its reliability.
- Concerns arise when the platform owner uses it to amplify personal views or manipulate public discourse, as this compromises editorial standards.
Importance of Social Media for News Dissemination
- Social media platforms are critical tools for reaching large audiences and sharing information quickly.
- However, the reliance on centralised platforms controlled by a few corporations raises issues of censorship and lack of free information flow.
- Governments can leverage their relationships with monopolistic platforms to filter content, restricting citizens’ access to information.
Decline in Editorial Standards
- Platforms with inadequate content moderation or ethical oversight create a mismatch with professional journalistic standards.
- A lack of trust and safety teams leads to unchecked hate speech and misinformation, harming democratic discourse.
Toxicity and Alternatives to Existing Platforms
- Some platforms have become increasingly toxic due to poor moderation and misuse of algorithms.
- Decentralised platforms such as Mastodon and Bluesky are alternatives, although they face challenges of usability and scalability.
- Centralised alternatives are seen as inadequate unless they incorporate meaningful decentralisation.
The Role of Moderation
- Effective moderation, both through human oversight and AI systems, is essential to curb hate speech and harmful content.
- Platforms need to invest in local content moderation, particularly in linguistically diverse countries, to address culturally nuanced issues.
- Without adequate investment, harmful narratives and violence can be fueled by unchecked content.
Social Media’s Potential for Democracy
- Social media can amplify voices, document atrocities, and connect people globally, playing a positive role in democratic societies.
- However, its benefits are undermined when monopolies control communication systems or suppress dissenting voices.
- Decentralised communication systems are necessary to prevent misuse by authoritarian or monopolistic entities.
Education and Ethical Media Platforms
- Media literacy and critical thinking need to be embedded in educational curriculums to help individuals process information responsibly.
- Ethical platforms with robust moderation and decentralised systems are vital for fostering healthy discourse and supporting journalism.
Conclusion: Balancing Potential and Risks
- Social media has immense potential for good, but unchecked use and centralised control can lead to significant harm.
- Investing in decentralised, ethical platforms and strengthening moderation systems is key to mitigating risks and preserving the democratic role of social media.
| Practice Question: Discuss the role of social media in shaping democratic discourse. Examine the challenges posed by platform ownership and centralization, and suggest measures to ensure ethical communication systems. (250 Words /15 marks) |
