| |

26 November 2024 : The Hindu Editorial Analysis

1. The Constitution still thrives, let it show India the way

(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 4)

Topic: GS2 – Indian Polity
Context
  • The article reflects on the 75th anniversary of India’s Constitution, highlighting Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s concerns about political equality juxtaposed with social and economic inequalities.
  • It examines progress in achieving equality and fraternity while noting persistent challenges, including caste-based divisions and institutional weaknesses.
  • The Constitution’s resilience amidst evolving socio-political dynamics is emphasized.

75th Anniversary of Constitution Adoption

  • November 26, 2024, marks the 75th anniversary of the Constituent Assembly’s adoption of the draft Constitution of India.
  • The Union government is commemorating this event with a special joint sitting of Parliament.
  • Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s speech on November 25, 1949, remains a key reflection on the Constitution’s success, emphasizing the importance of its implementation by capable custodians.

Challenges Identified by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

  • Equality and Fraternity:
    • Dr. Ambedkar highlighted the contradiction of political equality versus social and economic inequality.
    • He pointed out the denial of the principle of “one man, one value” in social and economic life.
  • Social Democracy:
    • Fraternity, essential for unity, was hindered by caste systems and religious divisions.
    • Liberty, equality, and fraternity must coexist; the absence of one weakens the others.

Progress in Equality

  • Affirmative Action:
    • India abolished untouchability and implemented reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
    • Reservations, initially temporary, are now entrenched in the system, though debates about their implications persist.
  • Caste Census:
    • Escalating demands for caste census reflect ongoing struggles for social and economic equality.
    • These efforts have implications for India’s constitutional practices and equality goals.

Fraternity and Nationhood

  • Lack of Fraternity:
    • Mobilization of votes based on caste, creed, and language hampers the development of fraternity.
    • While fraternity remains incomplete, national unity has strengthened, as seen during national events like cricket matches or conflicts like Kargil (1999) and Galwan (2020).
  • Reservations and Fraternity:
    • Scholars argue that caste-based reservations entrench divisions, contrary to Ambedkar’s vision of annihilating caste.
    • Ambedkar viewed fraternity as eroding caste hierarchies, while the extension of OBC reservations emphasized representation over elimination of caste.

The Constitution’s Resilience

  • Despite criticism from early opponents like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Constitution has endured over 75 years, evolving through 106 amendments.
  • Challenges such as weakened institutions, diminished parliamentary functions, judiciary pressures, and global critiques (e.g., V-Dem Institute’s “electoral autocracy” label) underscore the need for robust custodianship.

Ambedkar’s Call to Responsibility

  • Dr. Ambedkar reminded citizens that independence shifts accountability to Indians themselves.
  • Seventy-five years later, India must reduce shortcomings and uphold the Constitution’s guiding principles to ensure its continued success.
Practice Question:  Discuss how Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s vision of equality and fraternity remains relevant in addressing contemporary social and economic challenges in India. (150 Words /10 marks)

2. Feminist ideology in India’s constitutional discourse

(Source – The Hindu, International Edition – Page No. – 4)

Topic: GS2 – Indian Polity
Context
  • The article highlights the overlooked contributions of women in framing India’s Constitution, emphasizing their advocacy for gender equality, secularism, and social justice.
  • Despite their efforts, the promises of gender justice and the Uniform Civil Code remain unfulfilled.

Patriarchal Framing of the Constitution

  • The Indian Constitution’s creation often credits the “founding fathers,” overlooking the significant contributions of women members, termed as the “founding mothers.”
  • Women’s active involvement in drafting the Constitution was a continuation of the feminist movement, embedding their will and dissent into the document.
 Women Shaping India’s Constitution

Hansa Mehta: Advocated for gender equality, sought restrictions on religious rights that curtailed women’s emancipation, and supported the Uniform Civil Code.

Amrit Kaur: Emphasized the anti-woman tendencies in religious practices, fought for women’s rights and social justice, and helped draft key reforms.

Begum Aizaz Rasul: Championed secularism as a core feature of the Constitution.

Dakshayani Velayudhan: Criticized caste and gender discrimination, advocating for equality and justice.

Durgabai Deshmukh: Focused on women’s education and social welfare initiatives.

Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay: Highlighted the Constitution’s promise of justice and equality for women.

Intersectional Alliance for Social Revolution

  • The founding mothers aligned with B.R. Ambedkar’s critique of patriarchal Indian culture.
  • Amrit Kaur, one of the prominent women, rejected societal standards imposed by male-dominated systems.
  • These women worked to dismantle patriarchy within and outside the Constituent Assembly, though the nation has largely failed to honor their vision.

Fundamental Rights and the Uniform Civil Code (UCC)

  • Founding mothers viewed Fundamental Rights as a tool to challenge patriarchal social structures, including religion and family.
  • Hansa Mehta and Amrit Kaur pushed for the UCC to be included in Fundamental Rights but accepted its relegation to the Directive Principles, ensuring its prominence in future constitutional interpretations.
  • Their efforts strengthened the Directive Principles, aiding their constitutional significance in the 1980s.

Role in Defining Secularism and Freedom of Religion

  • Begum Aizaz Rasul highlighted secularism as a cornerstone of the Constitution.
  • Hansa Mehta advocated limiting religious rights to safeguard women’s equality and social reforms like the abolition of child marriage.
  • Amrit Kaur argued against unbridled religious freedom, warning of its potential to undermine progressive laws like the Widow Remarriage Act and the abolition of sati.

Unfulfilled Promises of Equality

  • Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay viewed the Constitution as a beacon of hope for women’s equality, but this optimism faded.
  • The 1974 report Towards Equality declared that the promise of gender equality remained unfulfilled even after two decades of independence.

Contemporary Challenges

  • Despite strong women leaders, India lacks a feminist stateswoman or jurist of transformative stature.
  • Women’s representation in power remains insufficient.
  • The UCC, envisioned as a tool for gender justice, remains unrealized due to political inaction, despite available jurisprudence to support it.
Practice Question:  Discuss the contributions of women members in the framing of the Indian Constitution and analyze how their efforts have influenced contemporary debates on gender justice and secularism. (150 Words /10 marks)

Similar Posts