Article 220 of Constitution of India – Restriction on practice after being a permanent Judge
Article 220 of Constitution of India deals with Restriction on practice after being a permanent Judge
Original Text of Article 220 of Constitution of India
No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation.—In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement3 of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.]
Questions related to Article 220 of Constitution of India
Article 220 prohibits a permanent Judge of a High Court, after retirement or resignation, from practicing in any court or before any authority within the same state where they served, as per the Constitution of India.
Yes, Article 220 allows a retired High Court judge to practice in the Supreme Court or High Courts of other states, but not in the same High Court where they held office.
The restriction ensures judicial impartiality and prevents conflicts of interest, safeguarding the integrity of the judiciary as mandated by the Articles of Indian Constitution.
No, this restriction applies only to permanent judges. Temporary or additional judges may have different service terms and are not bound by Article 220’s limitation, a point clarified in legal resources like Indian Kanoon.
You can explore Indian Kanoon for relevant judgments, bar council rules, and constitutional debates that explain the scope and intent of Article 220 of the Indian Constitution.
For Further Reference:
Other Related Links:
