- The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act of 1995 is to be repealed, according to the draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023, published by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB).
- The new measure seeks to harmonize DTH, IPTV, digital media, broadcasting, and over-the-top (OTT) regulations.
- This action is in line with the Prime Minister’s goals of “ease of doing business” and “ease of living” and comes after the IT Rules 2021 were introduced.
Concerns about Regulatory Intentions:
- The underlying goals of the Broadcasting Services Bill are doubtful, given the contentious character of the IT Rules 2021 and worries about possible government overreach.
- Regulations are necessary for the wellbeing of citizens, but the BJP’s experience with media regulation points to a possible emphasis on control over public service.
Potential Impact on Minority Representation:
- Opponents argue that the proposed Broadcasting Services Bill could be a factor in the marginalization or biased portrayal of minority Indian populations.
- The draft’s ambiguous language raises worries about the normalizing of a universal Hindu identity and the possibility of inciting animosity or discrimination against certain racial, religious, or linguistic communities.
Historical Context: Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995:
- The original purpose of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 was to control advertising material and programming in response to the problems caused by unlicensed cable television networks.
- On the other hand, crtics argue that rather than actual public service, the government’s emphasis on content regulation has historically been motivated by intermittent worries about cultural invasion.
Challenges and Failures of Previous Regulations:
- Achieving transparency and reducing the number of illicit cable businesses was a challenge for earlier rules, such as the 1995 Act and its revisions.
- The interconnection of broadcasters, politicians, businesspeople, and cable providers frequently resulted in unethical behavior and conflicts of interest. 2003 amendments attempted to increase openness but left the fundamental problems unaddressed.
Lack of Regulation on Conflicts of Interest:
- Conflicts of interest in the Indian media industry have not been sufficiently addressed by the government’s regulatory initiatives.
- It appears that this issue is not addressed in the draft Broadcasting Services Bill, which raises questions about how well it would provide accountability and openness.
Oligopolistic Media Ownership Tendencies:
- Critics argue that the government’s regulatory actions can unintentionally encourage media ownership trends toward oligopoly.
- Concerns regarding “cultural invasion” and “anti-national” programming are weighed against the possible effects on Indian residents’ welfare.
- The proposed bill seems to combine authority over digital infrastructure with the right of citizens to choose what they watch.
Need for Regulation on Conflicts of Interest:
- Regulations addressing conflicts of interest within the media sector are clearly needed, especially in light of the ongoing discussions about cultural invasion and national welfare.
- Some who oppose regulations that support “ease of business” contend that in order to guarantee just practices and true public service, “ease of control and regulation” should also come first.